Add all 8 course modules with converted markdown links
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
64
modules/07-traffic-engineering.md
Normal file
64
modules/07-traffic-engineering.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
|
||||
# Module 7: Traffic Engineering
|
||||
|
||||
> **Course**: [ISP Backbone Lab Course](../README.md)
|
||||
> **Previous**: [Module 6: Segment Routing](06-segment-routing.md)
|
||||
> **Next**: [Module 8: Attack & Defense](08-attack-defense.md)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Network Diagram
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
*SR-TE explicit path steering — default shortest path vs policy-driven SID stack path with Flex-Algo*
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Why TE?
|
||||
|
||||
By default, IS-IS picks the shortest path. But what if:
|
||||
- The shortest path is congested?
|
||||
- You want to send VoIP traffic on a low-latency path and bulk data on a high-bandwidth path?
|
||||
- A fiber cut takes out the shortest path and you need a pre-computed backup?
|
||||
|
||||
**Traffic Engineering** lets you define explicit paths through the network.
|
||||
|
||||
## SR-TE (Segment Routing Traffic Engineering)
|
||||
|
||||
With SR, TE is just a **stack of SIDs**. Want traffic to go P1 → P2 → P-CORE → P4 instead of the direct path? Push labels `[16002, 16005, 16004]` onto the packet. Done. No RSVP tunnels, no signaling protocol, no state in the core.
|
||||
|
||||
## Lab 7 Config: SR-TE Policy
|
||||
|
||||
**PE-EDGE1 (force traffic to PE-EDGE4 via a specific path):**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
segment-routing traffic-eng
|
||||
segment-list PATH-VIA-P2-PCORE
|
||||
index 10 mpls label 16002 ! P2
|
||||
index 20 mpls label 16005 ! P-CORE
|
||||
index 30 mpls label 16014 ! PE-EDGE4
|
||||
!
|
||||
policy STEER-TO-PE4
|
||||
color 100 end-point 10.0.0.14
|
||||
candidate-paths
|
||||
preference 200
|
||||
explicit segment-list PATH-VIA-P2-PCORE
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Flex-Algo (Advanced)
|
||||
|
||||
Flex-Algo lets you define **multiple topologies** on the same physical network. For example:
|
||||
- **Algorithm 0** (default): Shortest path by metric
|
||||
- **Algorithm 128**: Low-latency path (uses delay metric)
|
||||
- **Algorithm 129**: High-bandwidth path (avoids congested links)
|
||||
|
||||
Each algorithm creates a separate set of SIDs, so you can steer traffic into different topologies without explicit path lists.
|
||||
|
||||
## Understanding Check
|
||||
|
||||
1. How does SR-TE compare to RSVP-TE? What makes it simpler?
|
||||
2. What is a SID stack and how does it define a path?
|
||||
3. What is Flex-Algo and when would you use it over explicit SR-TE?
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
> **Next Module**: [Module 8: Attack & Defense Labs →](08-attack-defense.md)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user